August 17, 2019, Strategic Culture
Foundation (Russia)
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/08/17/the-anglo-american-origins-of-color-revolutions-ned/
A few years ago, very
few people understood the concept behind color revolutions.
Had
Russia and China’s leadership not decided to unite in solidarity in 2012 when they began vetoing the overthrow
of Bashar al Assad in Syria- followed by their alliance around the Belt and Road Initiative,
then it is doubtful that the color revolution concept would be as well-known as
it has become today.
At
that time, Russia and China realized that they had no choice but to go on the
counter offensive, since the regime change operations and colour revolutions
orchestrated by such organizations as the CIA-affiliated National Endowment
for Democracy (NED) and Soros Open Society Foundations were
ultimately designed to target them as those rose, orange, green or yellow
revolution efforts in Georgia, Ukraine, Iran or Hong Kong were always recognized
as weak points on the periphery of the threatened formation of a great power
alliance of sovereign Eurasian nations that would have the collective power to
challenge the power of the Anglo-American elite based in London and Wall
Street.
Russia’s 2015 expulsion of 12 major
conduits of color revolution included Soros’ Open Society Foundation as well as
the NED was
a powerful calling out of the enemy with the Foreign Ministry
calling them “a threat to the foundations of Russia’s Constitutional order
and national security”. This resulted in such fanatical calls by George
Soros for a $50 billion fund to counteract
Russia’s interference in defense of Ukraine’s democracy. Apparently the $5 billion spent by the NED in
Ukraine was not nearly enough (1).
In
spite of the light falling upon these cockroaches, NED and Open Society
operations continued in full force focusing on the weakest links the Grand
Chessboard unleashing what has become known as a “strategy of tension”.
Venezuela, Kashmir, Hong Kong, Tibet and Xinjian (dubbed East Turkistan by NED)
have all been targeted in recent years with millions of NED dollars pouring
into separatist groups, labour unions, student movements and fake news “opinion
shapers” under the guise of “democracy building”. $1.7 million in grants was
spent by NED in Hong Kong since 2017 which was a significant increase from
their $400 000 spent to coordinate the failed “Occupy HK” protest in 2014.
The
Case of China
In
response to over two months of controlled chaos, the Chinese government has
kept a remarkably restrained posture, allowing the Hong Kong authorities to
manage the situation with their police deprived of use of lethal weapons and
even giving into the protestors’ demand that the changes to the extradition
treaty that nominally sparked this mess be annulled. In spite of this patient
tone, the rioters who have run havoc on airports and public buildings have
created lists of demands that are all but impossible for mainland China to meet
including 1) an “independent committee to investigate the abuses of Chinese
authorities”, 2) for china to stop referring to rioters as “rioters”, 3) for
all charges against rioters to be dropped, and 4) universal suffrage- including
candidates promoting independence or rejoining the British Empire.
As
violence continues to grow, and as it has become an increasing reality that
some form of intervention from the mainland may occur to restore order, the
British Foreign Office has taken an aggressive tone threatening China with
“severe consequences” unless “a fully independent investigation” into police
Brutality were permitted. The former Colonial Governor of China Christopher
Patten attacked China by saying “Since president Xi has been in office, there’s
been a crackdown on dissent and dissidents everywhere, the party has been in
control of everything”.
The
Chinese Foreign Ministry responded saying “the UK has no sovereign
jurisdiction or right of supervision over Hong Kong… it is simply wrong for the
British Government to exert pressure. The Chinese side seriously urges the UK
to stop its interference in China’s internal affairs and stop making random and
inflammatory accusations on Hong Kong.”
The
British have not been able to conduct their manipulation of Hong Kong without
the vital role of America’s NGO dirty ops, and in true imperial fashion, the
political class from both sides of the aisle have attacked China with Senate
Majority leader Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi making the loudest noise
driving the American House Foreign Affairs Committee to
threaten “universal condemnation and swift consequences” if
Beijing intervenes. This has only made the photographs of Julie Eadeh, the head
of Political Office at the American Consulate in Hong Kong meeting with leaders
of the Hong Kong demonstrations that much more disgusting to any onlooker.
While
both Britain and America have been caught red handed organizing this colour
revolution, it is important to keep in mind who is controlling who.
The
Foreign Origins of the NED
Contrary
to popular opinion, the British Empire did not go away after WWII, nor did it
hand over the “keys to the kingdom” to America. It didn’t even become America’s
Junior Partner in a new Anglo-American special relationship. Contrary to
popular belief, it stayed in the drivers’ seat.
The
post WWII order was largely shaped by a British coup which didn’t take over
America without a fight. Nests
of Oxford-trained Rhodes Scholars, Fabians and other
ideologues embedded within the American establishment had a lot of work ahead
of them as they struggled to purge all nationalist impulses from the American
intelligence community. While the most aggressive purging of patriotic
Americans from the intelligence community occurred during the dissolution of
the OSS and creation of CIA in 1947 and the Communist witch hunt that followed,
there were other purges that were less well known.
As
an organization which was beginning to take form which was to become known as
the Trilateral Commission organized by Britain’s “hand in America” called the Council on
Foreign Relations and international Bilderberg Group, another purge
occurred in 1970 under the direction of James Schlesinger during his six month
stint as CIA director. At that time 1000 top CIA officials deemed “unfit” were
fired. This was followed nine years later as another 800 were fired under a
list drafted by
CIA “spymaster” Ted Shackley. Both Schlesinger and Shackley
were high level Trilateral Commission members who took part in the group’s 1973
formation and fully took power of America during Jimmy Carter’s 1977-1981
presidency which unleashed a dystopian reorganization of American foreign and
internal policy outlined in my previous report.
Project
Democracy Takes Over
By
the 1970s, the CIA’s dirty hand funding anarchist operations both within
America and abroad had become too well known as media coverage of their dirty
operations at home and abroad spoiled the patriotic image which the
intelligence community then desired. While the internal resistance to fascist
behaviour from within the intelligence Community itself was dealt with through
purges, the reality was that a new agency had to be created to take over those
functions of covert destabilization of foreign governments.
What
became Project Democracy herein originated with a Trilateral
Commission meeting in May 31, 1975 in Kyoto Japan as a protégé of Trilateral
Commission director Zbigniew Brzezinski named Samuel (Clash of Civilizations)
Huntington delivered the results of his Task Force on the Governability of Democracies. This
project was supervised by Schlesinger and Brzezinski and presented the notion
that democracies could not function adequately in the crisis conditions which
the Trilateral Commission was preparing to impose onto America and the world
through a process dubbed “the Controlled Disintegration of Society”.
The
Huntington report featured at the Trilateral meeting stated: “One might
consider… means of securing support and resources from foundations, business
corporations, labor unions, political parties, civic associations, and, where
possible and appropriate, governmental agencies for the creation of an
institute for the strengthening of democratic institutions.”
It
took 4 years for this blueprint to become reality. In 1979
three Trilateral Commission members named William Brock (RNC Chairman), Charles
Manatt (DNC Chairman) and George Agree (head of Freedom House) established an
organization called the American Political Foundation (APF) which
attempted to fulfil the objective laid out by Huntington in 1975.
The
APF was used to set up a program using federal funds called the Democracy
Program which issued an interim report “The Commitment to Democracy”
which said: “No theme requires more sustained attention in our time than
the necessity for strengthening the future chances of democratic societies in a
world that remains predominantly unfree or partially fettered by repressive
governments. … There has never been a comprehensive structure for a
non-governmental effort through which the resources of America’s pluralistic
constituencies . .. could be mobilized effectively.”
In
May 1981, Henry Kissinger who had replaced Brzezinski as head of the Trilateral
Commission and had many operatives planted around President Reagan, gave a speech at Britain’s
Chatham House (the controlling hand behind the Council
on Foreign Relations) where he described his work as Secretary of State
saying that the British “became a participant in internal American deliberations,
to a degree probably never practiced between sovereign nations… In my White
House incarnation then, I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and
more closely engaged than I did the American State Department… It was
symptomatic”. In his speech, Kissinger outlined the battle between
Churchill vs FDR during WWII and made the point that he favored the Churchill
worldview for the post war world (And ironically also that of Prince Metternich
who ran the Congress of Vienna that snuffed out democratic movements across
Europe in 1815).
In
June 1982, Reagan’s Westminster Palace speech
officially inaugurated the NED and by November 1983, the National Endowment for
Democracy Act was passed bringing this new covert organization into reality
with $31 million of funding under four subsidiary organizations (AFL-CIO Free
Trade Union Institute, The US Chamber of Commerce’s Center for International
Private Enterprise, the International Republican Institute and the
International Democratic Institute) (2).
Throughout
the 1980s, this organization went to work managing Iran-Contra, destabilizing
Soviet states and unleashing the first “official” modern color revolution in
the form of the Yellow revolution that ousted Philippine president Ferdinand
Marcos. Speaking more candidly than usual, NED President David Ignatius said in 1991 “a lot of
what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA”.
With
the collapse of the Soviet Union, the NED was instrumental in bringing former
Warsaw Pact nations into NATO/WTO system and the New World Order was announced
by Bush Sr. and Kissinger- both of whom were rewarded with knighthoods for
their service to the Crown in 1992 and 1995 respectively.
Of
course, the vast web of NGOs permeating the geopolitical terrain can only be
effective as long as no one says the truth and “names the game”. The very act
of calling out their nefarious motives renders them impotent and this simple
fact has made the recently announced China-Russia arrangement to
formulate a proper strategic response to color revolutions so important in the
current fight.
(1)
Undoubtedly President Trump’s gutting of NED funding by two thirds in 2018
only re-enforced Soros’ accusations that Putin is the guiding hand in America
while pouring millions into anti-Trump regime change operations in America.
While neocons such as Bolton, Pompeo and Senate leader Mitch Mcconnell have
taken a hardline stance against China in support of the color revolution, it
should be noted that Trump has continuously taken an opposite line Tweeting on
August 14 that “China is not our problem” and that “the problem is with the
FED”.
(2)
At the beginning of 1984, a similar re-organization had occurred in Canada
under the guidance of Privy Council Clerk/Trilateral Commission member Michael
Pitfield who created CSIS when the RCMP’s “dirty operations” during the FLQ
crisis were made known in a series of newspaper reports.
*Matthew J.L. Ehret is a journalist,
lecturer and founder of the Canadian Patriot Review. He is also the co-founder
of the Rising Tide Foundation.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário