April 04th, 2019, MintPress News
https://www.mintpressnews.com (USA) https://www.mintpressnews.com/brazil-colombia-now-venezuela-us-pursues-right-wing-hegemony-south-america/256934/
World domination: it’s a funny
concept. We can imagine old dudes with messy hair and thick glasses taking over
the world or the caricature of a humanoid villain that wears a skull and
crossbones, but what about applying it to the real world? Who’s closest to
taking over the world we live in? Do I even need to say it?
When it comes to Iran, North Korea
or, as of late, Venezuela, it’s impossible to FULLY understand the goals behind
a U.S. regime-change operation if we don’t understand the U.S.’ regional aims,
and by extension, global aims. We have to understand the United States for the
totality of its existence. With dozens if not hundreds of military bases on
every continent, the United States is the only empire in the world right now;
its goals and ambitions can’t be anything but global. We can’t remove America’s
behavior from this context.
So how does Venezuela fit into
this larger context?
Let’s start by recognizing that controlling countries like Venezuela
isn’t the end in and of itself but the means to a larger goal, a U.S.-dominated
South America.
The political character of Venezuela is obviously antithetical to the
political character of the United States in many ways. The United States
government is run by the rich and for the rich. It answers to private interests
like banks, the military industrial complex, or the gun industry.
The current Venezuelan government acts in the interest of the poor and
working class. It has nationalized private industries and factories that
exploited Venezuela, an initiative that angered Venezuela’s rich as well as
American businessmen seeking to make profits in Venezuela. Venezuela, unlike
the U.S., does not have massive industries that make profits solely by
manufacturing weapons or issuing predatory loans to poor people who want houses
to live in.
This is why U.S. National Security Advisor John Bolton called the
socialist governments of Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba a “troika of tyranny.”
Their governments are obstacles to U.S.-backed neoliberal hegemony in the region.
Venezuela inspires progressive movements in other countries to combat the
neoliberal vision as well, threatening to reverse the spread of neoliberalism.
So what timeless military maneuver do you turn to take out a cornered
enemy? A pincer move, of course.
The U.S. plays South American “Go”
Venezuela sits north of Brazil and east of Colombia, two regional powers
being fully backed up by the United States. It’s physically cut off from more
friendly South American countries. Both Colombia and Brazil have denounced
President Nicolás Maduro as illegitimate and are trying to ram “aid” through
the Venezuelan border. Both countries have a U.S. military presence.
Colombia receives the most U.S. aid in the Western Hemisphere, which is
why Hugo Chavez once called Colombia the Israel of Latin America. Colombia acts
as a launching pad for the U.S. to carry out its foreign policy goals in South
America, very similar to the role Israel serves for the U.S. empire in the
Middle East. There are several U.S. military bases in Colombia and Colombia
recently became NATO’s first “global partner” in Latin America.
Since the 1960’s, the U.S. has openly funded the Colombian government
and military to suppress left-wing movements, more recently under the guise of
preventing drug trafficking. President Bill Clinton famously initiated Plan
Colombia in 2000, a policy intended to stop drug-trafficking and left-wing
insurgency in Colombia. The plan was widely understood to be a failure since
drug profits soared during this period. The Colombian War on Drugs caused a
civil conflict that displaced 3 million Colombians.
But remember, a spokesman of the Reagan administration admitted that Colombian
cocaine trafficking helped fund the U.S.-backed anti-communist Contra rebels in
Nicaragua. It was the CIA that sold crack cocaine in South Central LA to poison
poor, black communities.
The War on Drugs wasn’t actually about ending drug trafficking; it was
just a convenient alibi to justify decades of massive U.S. support for
right-wing rule in Colombia to suppress left-wing movements — a process that
persists to the present day. They’re still trying to accuse Maduro of being
connected to Colombian drug traffickers! How convenient!
The fruit company, Chiquita, pleaded guilty to paying right-wing
paramilitary groups to protect Chiquita’s banana interests in the country,
resulting in the murder of thousands of Colombians, so this was about that
banana money as well. But I get it, America — I don’t want to imagine a world
where the bananas fall into the hands of communist terrorists either.
Brazil, on the other hand, recently reclaimed its place as a junior
partner in the U.S. empire. While the U.S., in Operation Condor, assassinated
scores of opposition figures in the 1970s to protect Brazil’s neoliberal
military dictatorship, through decades of battle, progressive forces managed to
organize under the banner of the Workers Party and democratic elections were
established.
The Workers Party won the 2003 presidential elections and Luiz Inacio
Lula Da Silva began implementing progressive reforms, redistributive laws,
quotas for oppressed groups, and the bolstering of workers’ rights. Lula was
the most popular Brazilian president of all time.
Lula’s successor, Dilma Rousseff, continued Lula’s progressive policies,
which began to threaten the rich in Brazil. Leaked audio tapes revealed that
Dilma refused to back away from sending white-collar criminals to jail, a
prospect that scared the rich into impeaching Rousseff under trumped-up
corruption charges.
The movement to oust Dilma was lead by openly libertarian groups like
the Free Brazil Movement and Students for Liberty. These groups demanded free
markets, deregulation and privatization of the Brazilian economy. The leaders
of these seemingly grassroots organizations were funded and trained by the
Atlas Network.
Among others, Atlas Network takes money from the Koch brothers — which
is just like … well if you’re going to covertly undermine a sovereign
government and give the appearance of not having U.S. involvement, … pick
anyone else.
Dilma and her cabinet were replaced by an all-white, all-male cabinet,
the first woman-less cabinet in Brazilian history. They immediately began
rolling back protections for workers and regulations on the wealthy. The Obama
administration hailed this blatant coup as a democratic process.
Dominoes in reverse
U.S. President Donald Trump is reading directly out of Obama’s Brazil
playbook in asserting that Juan Guaidó is the democratically elected president
of Venezuela. Trump also hailed the election of Brazil’s fascist president,
Jair Bolsonaro, who has said he is open to having a U.S. military base in
Brazil and is actively calling for regime change in Venezuela, just as the U.S.
wants.
In the future, we may see attacks against the progressive president of
Bolivia, Evo Morales. The mainstream media has been discreetly priming us for
another “war for democracy” in Bolivia, one of Venezuela’s only progressive
allies in South America.
So if anyone tries to tell you that the U.S. coup in Venezuela isn’t
about imperialism and U.S. hegemony, remind them that Venezuela isn’t some
special, isolated case of U.S. intervention in Latin America. Far from it. The
U.S. has been doing exactly what it’s trying to do to Venezuela to Colombia and
Brazil — and the majority of Latin American countries, for that matter — for
decades. It’s using its puppet regimes in these countries, not even discreetly,
to wage a two-front war on Venezuela. It’s like the domino theory but
backwards!
If the U.S. weren’t trying to turn Venezuela into a playground for the
rich, a bastion of capitalism, if it were actually trying to assert human
rights in Venezuela, it would be an exception to a very consistent pattern.
*Kei Pritsker is
a journalist and activist located in Washington DC. Kei focuses on
international politics and economics. He previously worked as a producer at RT
America.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário